Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR DX AF-S Nikkor Review

(From Nikon lens literature) The new compact and affordable AF-S DX NIKKOR 18-105mm ƒ/3.5-5.6G ED VR lens continues the tradition of NIKKOR precision optics to provide photographers with sharp, high-resolution images. The integration of an ultra-compact Silent Wave Motor ensures fast, quiet and accurate autofocus operation, and complements the lens’ compact form factor.
SLRgear Review
September 2, 2008
by Andrew Alexander
The Nikon 18-105mm ƒ/3.5-5.6 is Nikon ‘s latest ”kit ” lens, sold with the D90 digital SLR camera. The lens is designed to fit a television camera with an APS-C ( ”subframe ” ) detector, so while it will mount on Nikon film or FX digital bodies, it will show obvious vignetting when set to any focal distance.

small and fall, the 18-105mm represents a field of opinion of approximately 27-158mm in 35mm terms. To economize and create a more effective design, the lens is equipped with a variable star aperture ; as the soar extends the focal distance, both the smallest and the largest apertures change. The follow chart represents the largest and smallest apertures you can expect at a given focal duration :

Focal length 18mm 24mm 35mm 50mm 70mm 105mm
Largest aperture ƒ/3.5 ƒ/3.8 ƒ/4.5 ƒ/5 ƒ/5.3 ƒ/5.6
Smallest aperture ƒ/22 ƒ/25 ƒ/29 ƒ/32 ƒ/36 ƒ/36

The lens is equipped with Nikon ‘s vibration reduction ( VR ) technology, advertising a hand-holding improvement of up to three stops. The lens ships with a petal-shaped hood, takes 67mm filters, and is available with a MSRP of $ 400 .
Sharpness
The 18-105mm ƒ/3.5-5.6 provides identical sharp results, at least arsenic good as its late contemporaries and better than former designs in the same focal distance image .
possibly the best bible to describe the pungency profile of the 18-105mm is ‘consistent ‘. With most zoom lenses, specially in the ”kit ” class, the architect must juggle a variety of factors, not the least of which is the price of the design. frequently a lens will be a good fisheye performer, only to suffer when used at fully telephotograph ; or, vice versa. This is not the case with the 18-105mm, which shows excellent performance at all focal lengths .
Most lenses show off their imperfections when used at their widest aperture. The 18-105mm is very abrupt wide open at all focal lengths, with just little traces of corner softness ; typically, there is a big region of central asperity ( the ”sweet spot ” ) at 1 blur unit, and corners soften very slenderly to 2-2.5 smear units. Stopping down by merely one aperture setting improves this performance ; best results are obtained in the 35-50mm range, where corner softness disappears. By ƒ/8, the lens reaches its optimum operation at all focal lengths, though for the mid-range ( again, 35-50mm ) the differences between ƒ/5.6 and ƒ/8 are negligible .
If there ‘s a weakness in the lens at all, it would be operation at 105mm, where picture edge does n’t quite reach the flat seen at early focal lengths. however you ‘d be distressed to see the quality difference in practical use .
performance with the lens in full stopped-down is n’t a thoroughly, but this is to be expected. If you need to stop down the lens, keeping it at the ƒ/22 will give you identical estimable results – between 2 and 2.5 smear units across the frame. The lens is capable of stopping down further, between ƒ/25 and ƒ/36 depending on the focal length, but at these apertures diffraction takes a price on image distinctness, resulting in images showing between 4 and 5 confuse units across the skeletal system .
To summarize, the 18-105mm provides excellent results for acuteness across all focal lengths and apertures below ƒ/22. Optimal performance is seen at ƒ/8, but the difference in quality between ƒ/8 and when the lens is used at its widest apertures should n’t stop you from using the lens however you wish .
Chromatic Aberration
Chromatic aberration is award in images produced with this lens, but alone most perceptibly when used at its widest focal length ( 18mm ). CA is generally well-controlled at all focal lengths, showing up largely in the corners ( this is represented by the red ”maximum ” cable in our CA test results graph ). Zooming out slightly reduces the presence of chromatic aberration drastically .
generally, the choice of aperture does n’t in truth influence the presence of chromatic aberration, but according to the examination charts we do note a slender originate in CA as the lens is stopped down .
Shading (”Vignetting”)
The 18-105mm does show some testify of corner shading, but its presence is fairly subtle. If you demand absolutely no corner shading in images produced by this lens, you ‘ll have to use it at apertures of ƒ/11 or smaller ; larger apertures result in some form of corner shading. Using a focal length of 35-50mm will help ; these focal lengths are a bite more forgive, and will only produce meaning recess shading when the lens is used at apertures wider than ƒ/8 .
At the focal length extremes, upwards of 2/3 of a catch of corner shading can be seen when the lens is used at its largest aperture .
Distortion
Distortion has always been a sport of Nikon ‘s consumer-level soar lenses, and the 18-105mm has not improved in this respect. There is no focal length setting where the lens has been optimized to produce a distortion-free image. The distorted shape profile for the lens varies widely with the focal distance being used .

Test sample, upper left corner,
showing pincushion distortion.

At the wide fish focal lengths ( 18-21mm ), distortion is distinctly of the ”barrel ” type, with the center of the prototype pushing outbound from the middle. This human body of distortion is easier to correct in image post-processing software, as both the edges and the center of the trope are barrel-distorted. At its widest point ( 18mm ) the edges of the image show 1 % barrel distorted shape .
From 24mm onwards, we see a complex distortion profile : the edges of the image exhibit pincushion-style aberration ( the edges of the effigy are ”pulled ” into the frame ) while the concentrate exhibits barrel aberration. The effect is n’t dramatically apparent – but if you need your photograph to show square lines as sincerely straight, then you ‘re in for a bit of a surprise. Straight lines will show the ”moustache ” effect, where they bend one means at one edge, another way in the center, and then back the first room at the other border. This shape of aberration is fairly coherent from 50-105mm ; fortunately, it ‘s not particularly hard, at around 0.4 % barrel distortion in the center and -0.7 % pincushion distortion at the edges .
Autofocus Operation
As an AF-S lens, autofocus operation is promptly and about dumb. The 18-105mm will work on all Nikon camera bodies that support SWM ( silent wave drive ) lenses. Autofocus results can be overridden at any time by simply turning the focus hoop .
Macro
The 18-105mm is n’t designed for macro work, but is holds up with a respectable 1:5 reproduction ratio ( 0.2x magnification ). minimal close-focusing range is 45cm ( about one and a one-half feet ) from the picture detector ; from the end of the lens, you ‘re looking at about 28cm ( 11 inches ) .
Build Quality and Handling

The 18-105mm plugs a gap in Nikon ‘s 18mm+ roll of consumer rapid climb lenses between the 18-70mm and 18-135mm lenses. The 18-105mm can be thought of as a 18-135mm with reduce reach, having a lot in common with that design. In fact it uses the like number of elements in about an identical arrangement, but one group of lens elements has incorporated Nikon ‘s VR system. It besides retains the 18-135mm ‘s seven curved diaphragm blades. personally, I ca n’t see the justification for another zoom lens in this category ; possibly the designers could n’t make a VR-enabled 18-135mm lens knead, and the 18-105mm was the compromise .
The 18-105mm is a solid lens, armed with equally many acronym descriptors as Nikon could muster : ED ( Extra-low dispersion glass elements, to reduce chromatic aberration ), SID ( Super Integrated Coating, to reduce flare ), ASP ( aspheric lens elements, for fisheye performance ), IF ( internal focalization, so the lens does n’t change its length during focus ), D ( provides outdistance information ), G ( it ‘s a G-series lens, with no aperture ring ), SWM ( it ‘s an AF-S lens, so it uses a silent wave motor for debauched focusing ), VR ( vibration reduction ) and DX ( uses smaller glass elements that merely truly cover a subframe television camera body ) .
Compared to the 18-135mm, it ‘s just slightly ( 3mm ) longer and wider, and 35 grams heavier ( 420g ), no doubt to accommodate the VR system. It uses the lapp 67mm filters, which do n’t rotate during concenter or rapid climb operation. The lens does n’t have the fit and finish of previous kit lenses ; there is no distance scale, and consequently no depth-of-field markings. focal lengths are marked on the lens near the soar ring, but that ‘s about it. Two control switches are available on the lens ‘ impart side : one which enables or disables autofocus ( A or M ) and one which enables or disables vibration decrease ( ON or OFF ) .
The soar surround is the major feature of speech of the lens, mounted ahead of the focus hoop. It ‘s over 1.5 inches across-the-board and is composed of a thickly costate arctic texture which is identical easily to grip. The soar action of the lens is not home, so the lens will extend about 2 supernumerary inches at the 105mm end. The soar resound travels approximately 80 degrees in its range. There is a courteous resistance in the rapid climb action, such that I doubt rapid climb creep will be a problem with this lens .
The focus ring of the lens a comparative afterthought, merely 5/16 of an column inch in width. It does have a decent rubber texture though, with raised ridges, and the dispute in sizes means you wo n’t by chance turn the incorrect ring ( provided you remember which ring does what ). The concentrate ring only offers around 100 degrees of travel, which is n’t in truth that great for manual concenter control. It is properly politic, but we ‘ve decidedly seen better manual concentrate control. My feel is however that this lens is not aimed at the manual of arms focus crowd .
The lens comes standard with a fictile, petal-shaped lens hood that attaches via a bayonet mount and can be reversed for storehouse. The lens is n’t flocked on the inside but does a decent job shielding the front element from sun coming in at external oblique muscle angles. The lens hood adds an extra 1.25 inches to the overall length of the lens .
We ‘re in the final stages of our picture stabilization quiz protocols, and while I ca n’t give you definitive numbers for the VR operation of the 18-105mm, I can tell you it ‘s more than equitable a device and truly does offer better operation in controlling camera milkshake. The VR employed in the 18-105mm is n’t ampere robust as that seen in the 18-200mm, offering only one dress for VR ( on and off ). The VR2 system allows for ”active ” and ”normal ” VR use, allowing for panning shots which compensate for erect shake only .
Alternatives
Nikon 18-135mm ƒ/3.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S DX ~ $ 340
If you do n’t need shaking reduction, you ‘ll get pretty much the same ocular properties in the 18-135mm and an extra reach of 30mm on the telephotograph end. Looking identical strictly at the numbers the 18-135mm is slightly sharper than the 18-105mm, particularly in the corners ; however, the 18-105mm does a a lot better job at reducing chromatic aberration. The 18-135mm shows off worse corner shade, and both lenses produce an odd traffic pattern of distortion through their focal lengths .
Nikon 18-200mm ƒ/3.5-5.6G IF-ED AF-S DX VR ~ $ 660
If you do desire VR, then this is reasonably much the lens in the Nikon batting order you want ( or, the 18-55mm VR, if you do n’t need the telephotograph reach ). The 18-200mm is a little longer in the tooth than the 18-105mm, and therefore the 18-105mm can benefit from some of Nikon ‘s newer technical foul developments. The 200mm is n’t american samoa acute as the 105mm, but in other categories the two lenses fare about the lapp .
sigma 18-125mm ƒ/3.5-5.6 DC OS HSM ~ $ 400
If you prefer to try a non-Nikon alternative, the Sigma 18-125mm is available for your consideration. We have n’t even tested this lens, but exploiter reviews are broadly positive. It features a higher macro evaluation ( 1:3.8 reproduction ), but apart from being slightly heavier ( 505g ) it ‘s very like to the Nikon 18-105mm. however, the exploiter review, american samoa good as our test of the similar Sigma 18-200mm lens, suggest that optimum image acuteness can merely be achieved when the lens is significantly stopped down .
Conclusion
The Nikon 18-105mm ƒ/3.5-5.6 decidedly raises the cake for Nikon ‘s current lineup of kit lenses ; systematically sharply, tied at large apertures, with thoroughly resistance to chromatic aberration. Corner shade is prevailing, but it ‘s not a detectable trouble. distortion is discernible and irregular, but again, you ‘re credibly merely going to notice it if you need your straight lines to be absolutely straight .
The inclusion of VR to this level of lens is a welcome accession ; we do n’t have price for the lens individually, but there will last be an alternate to the 18-200mm VR for users who do n’t need that roll of focal lengths. Nikon was able to improve the optical quality, reduce the weight, and presumably, the end price. It ‘s easy to recommend the 18-105mm to Nikon shooters as an excellent walk-around lens .
Sample Photos
The VFA target should give you a dependable theme of distinctness in the center and corners, a well as some theme of the extent of barrel or pincushion distortion and chromatic aberration, while the still Life subject may help in judging contrast and color. We shoot both images using the default JPEG settings and manual white balance of our test bodies, so the images should be quite consistent from lens to lens .
As appropriate, we shoot these with both full-frame and sub-frame bodies, at a rate of focal lengths, and at both utmost aperture and ƒ/8. For the ”VFA ” aim ( the finder accuracy prey from Imaging Resource ), we besides provide sample crops from the center and upper-left corner of each film, so you can cursorily get a feel of relative sharpness, without having to download and inspect the full-res images. To avoid outer space limitations with the layout of our review pages, indexes to the examination shots launch in separate windows .

Nikon 18-105mm f/3.5-5.6G ED VR DX AF-S Nikkor User Reviews

8.4/10

average of 29 review(s)

Build Quality

7.7/10

Image Quality

8.4/10

Write your own review!

  • 10 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Anaxagoras ( 3 reviews ) and excellent for the monetary value
    none
    Over the decades I ‘ve owned lots of cameras and lenses – good, bad and immaterial.

    This is one of the better lenses I ‘ve owned and by army for the liberation of rwanda and away the best kit lens I ‘ve ever owned.

    I ‘m merely amazed at how good it is given that Nikon bundle it with their DX DSLRs for such a low price .

  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by AndyF ( 4 reviews ) and low-cost VR lens, light burden and sharp enogh for me !
    At the price, I ca n’t think of one .
    I bought this second handwriting about 18 months ago and I ‘m in truth pleased with the results.

    It is a surprisingly full lens and only comes off the camera if I need something with a longer strive or genuine macro capability.

    The VR is only actually needed in low idle but it surely works when you want it to .

  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by eskil ( 8 reviews ) and good rapid climb scope, low-cost
    A piece soft, noticable distorsion, bum build timbre
    As a beginners first ( and only ) lens the Nikon 18-105 is a beneficial option, specially if budget is tight. It is more powerfull than the 18-55 but not as heavy and expensive as the 18-200. While it does not have the ocular or mechanical quality of the 16-85 it cost about 1/3.

    Sharpnes is becoming, sometimes evening commodity, but not much more. Distorsion is reasonably noticable and non-linear which makes it diffucult to correct in camera or in post-processing. The mount is formative and clothing soon makes it fit loosely. There is no weather-sealing gasket or focus distance scale .

  • 7 out of 10 points
    and recommended by hunter ( 2 reviews ) and rate, decently sharpy for kit, VR
    ugly distortion, fictile, average AF focal ratio
    very decent kit lens and besides beat the similiar kit lenses on the marketplace at similar price. aberration is preety discernible and building complex to say. It will work good on 12mpx -16mpx detector early fresh front for better lens for more demand detector. Oh Af rush is decent but nothing to rave approximately. besides sharpness is preety nice ( besides little less shrill on corners ). this lens is very sharp at 5.6 ( cashbox center to edge ) and up to about f10, only using at 105mm close it a little to about f7.1 or f8. VR is besides one good sharpen of this lens in my hands I can get a good result of 1/2 accelerate of actual focal lenght.

    A good performer if this is your step into dsrl world .

  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by kurdistan workers party ( 8 reviews ) and inner light
    Weak at 105mm
    18-105 bought from Adorama as a refurb blank corner deal. Cheap and worth it. This is the lens iodine put on my D7000 when my wife is using it.

    Sharp from 18-about 90 or so. not any better than 18-200 that one can tell. very light, childlike and brassy. I do n’t even have a filter on it …

    I besides have 5 other nikkors … so in comparing if you can spring for a longer rapid climb, go for it. I have had this lens for 3 years and it serves a good aim for family gatherings, with VR and depleted light shots … And do n’t be afraid of the white box jobs. They are very well even though the guarantee is one year rather of five. The merely lens that has let me down was an 18-200.

    The 18-105 is a good sacrificial lamb if you have to share your television camera with others, besides .

  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by tamiry ( 1 reviews ) and easy to use, vr, acuteness, price
    distorted shape at depleted focal duration
    I bought this lens with the Nikon D7000.
    At first I thought that the lens will produce standard trope but to my surprise the pictures come out amazing.
    The lens is very easy to use and is suitable for any use, whether across-the-board or close-up photography.
    In the car focus status the lens will get the desire result for the dim-witted user but not for professional exploiter.
    There is a little distortion at the corners of the lens- vignete, specially at 105 focal length,
    Nothing that damage the prototype and can be easily corrected in Photoshop.
    I use that lens for at least 85 % of the pictures I take.
    Lens defy coarse conditions, cold and estrus, not affected by them at all.
    strongly recommended for those looking for a lens to a wide range of low-cost activities for every budget .
  • 10 out of 10 points
    and recommended by elk ( 21 reviews ) and low-cost and highly efficient lens with utilitarian focal lengths
    none
    I am a professional Nikon user so I expect eminent operation, and this lens surely provides superb treatment and ocular perfection at a very first gear cost.

    Works perfectly with my D300 and D90 camera bodies when I want a light-weight authentic lens that covers 18-105mm. clamant focus and sharp as any of the master zoom lenses I use.

    On the D5100 camera torso it is very efficient for change of location and life style photography. amazingly sharp at all focal lengths.

    I bought this one from Grays of Westminster .

  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by hackmann ( 5 reviews ) and impressive Image Quality at 70mm f5.6, vr effective and mum, walkaround lens ,
    Some chromatic aberrance at wide agle, focus hunt at dark ( motivation dart led to focus ), excessively much vignete at 105mm
    This is the best low-cost walk around lens.

    Only problem I found it tends to give excessively much cool temperature shots, some chromatic aberration at across-the-board agle and besides much vignete at 105mm.

    Despite that is a impressive lens, 80 % of my shots i use this lens, even having some expensive ones. very full for portraits.

    Check some awsome shots i had with this at my web page :

    hypertext transfer protocol : //www.carloshackmannphotography.com/Galleries/Landscapes/14214801_Xvmfw # 1050422248_WCZ6v
    hypertext transfer protocol : //www.carloshackmannphotography.com/Galleries/Landscapes/14214801_Xvmfw # 1050421209_Zz5MR
    hypertext transfer protocol : //www.carloshackmannphotography.com/Galleries/Landscapes/14214801_Xvmfw # 1050401443_MQ7yN
    hypertext transfer protocol : //www.carloshackmannphotography.com/Galleries/Landscapes/14214801_Xvmfw # 1050399814_VU2Dy
    hypertext transfer protocol : //www.carloshackmannphotography.com/Galleries/Landscapes/14214801_Xvmfw # 1060039475_dpCRB

  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by nikonfreak ( 4 reviews ) and Decent quatity for a budget zoom, vr, ideal walk around lens
    none very ( the flaws are acceptable at the price i piad )
    this is a good lens for it ‘s price, atleast my example is. The most important reaseons to buy were the long reach from 18-105 millimeter aka 27mm -157.5 millimeter ( 35mm ).

    the second one was the VR serve and the one-third the ED glass element, on my Nikon D80 and D50 it is a estimable walk of life around lens

  • 6 out of 10 points
    and not recommended by Nikoboyd ( 12 reviews ) and useful soar crop, very good VR
    not durable
    I use this lens for half a class. It was a good lens ; good acuteness, good VR, fairly focusing speed, etc. I say “ it was ” because the focus mechanism was broken a week ago. It worked at most zoom image but I felt like something jammed inside at 105 millimeter. and MF did n’t work ! ! !

    I decided to sell it AS-IS on a local anesthetic web site.

    What ‘s up Nikon. Your lens last only 6 months. I have been using many Nikkon cameras and lenses for more than 10 years. This is my first Nikkor that was broken. I do n’t believe it. My ancient manual focus Nikkors are however alert, they built to last everlastingly .

  • 7 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Perry Rhodan ( 41 reviews ) and Sharp, covenant, quick, light, handling overall, price
    very nothing at this price
    After using a set of gear ( C and N ) this thus visit kit-lens blew me away on the D90. With the in-camera corrections of the D90 it is reallygood what this lens can do. For the D7k its a sedative. AF is erratic and IQ only so/so. The 16mp´s on the D7k are clearly to much for this bum lens. To bad.

  • 10 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Focus ( 11 reviews ) and long reach, VR, sharp, crisp, acuate
    none
    I got this lens after using the 16-85 VR for about a year and it ‘s been dissapointing to find out it has a good flaw with matrix meter.
    But I ‘m quite certain it ‘s the body, not the lens.
    I used it with blot and CW meter and the results are just deoxyadenosine monophosphate good as from the 16-85 VR which costs more than twice.
    excellent lens for the money. Ca n’t be beat .
  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Front-Ranger ( 4 reviews ) and very sharp, well contrast, VR, hearty construction, no creep, capital price
    Plastic backing, would be courteous to have a distance plate
    I originally purchased a D300 bundled with the 18-135 in December of 2007. While I got identical commodity results with that lens, I painfully missed having shaking reduction. After waiting about a year for something with VR in a like rate, the D90 was announced with this lens. I sold the 18-135 and picked up a copy of the 18-105 at a identical attractive price.

    I have found this lens to be a step astir in barely about every catagory. While the 18-135 may have a bantam advantage in corner acuteness, I do n’t think any remainder is promptly apparent. If you can stop down a bit, the images become identical. Plus the VR more than makes up for any little difference in sharpness. VR yields a enormous improvement. I can now truly say that it is a rejoice to shoot hand-held.

    According to the review, the 18-105 is much better than the 18-135 at reducing chromatic aberration. Since the D300 automatically process that out, I do n’t have a basis for comparison there.

    I have seen a noticable improvement in both shadow and distortion over the 18-135. The distortion of the 18-105 is more elusive and crinkled versus the pronounce pincushion distorted shape of the 18-135 at most of the higher focal lengths. I used to run shots with architectural details through PT Lens or DxO Optics but now I am content to leave them as shot for everday use.

    For the humble tradeoff of 30mm of reduced reach versus the 18-135, this lens is a meaning improvement. It ‘s impressively acute and well constructed for the price. overall, I could n’t be happier … … … …. : )

  • 6 out of 10 points
    and not recommended by PuxaVida ( 6 reviews ) and VR, good IQ, good price with VR function
    heavy distorted shape, soft beyond 50mm
    A very all-around lens and balances well with D90. VR is useful at tele range.

    Actually, flush though it has a high soar range the best results in terms of resolution ( concentrate and edges ) and distortion can be get around 24-35mm. other than that the IQ gets slenderly worse and distorted shape gets in truth heavier.

    I sold this one and bought a 24-85mm f/2.8-4D. And I believe it was the right thing to do .

  • 7 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Hughesy ( 1 reviews ) and Sharp, Contrast, Lightweight, VR, Decent size Focus Ring, Solid Construction
    Plastic Mount
    For a kit lens with the D90 I could n’t believe the pungency of the images, while wide afford there is corner softness on most focal lengths, stopping down to f/5.6 at the broad end fixes most of the this.

    I found the sweetness spot for my lens was at f/8 with center asperity being somewhat sharper at f/5.6 from 35-70mm, however at f/8 the frame is sharp all over.

    – detectable vignetting at wide end
    – VR works well enough for me that iodine can get 7 out of 10 shots shrill at a 1/2 sec exposure handheld @ 18-50mm
    – Compared to the 28-105mm f/3.5~4.5D IF it is slenderly sharper at all focal lengths, That being said the images become about the same in terms of asperity when you get to f/8-f/10

    I took this lens to an Airshow while the 105mm is just scantily adequate for take off and landing shots the shots that one did take surprise me for a not prime lens. I will most probably hold on to this lens until one get the 16-85mm VR,

    besides I used this lens on the D90 I do not know operation on other cameras .

  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by camerafreak ( 1 reviews ) and excellent acuteness, respect, general versatility
    Distortion a little hard, Vignetting visible at widest aperture at 18mm, though not terribly apparent on the field .
    If you can get around the len ‘s reasonably pronounce distorted shape at the wide end, it is decidedly a mistreat above all early “ kit lens ” until your budget allows for a much more expensive f/2.8 standard zoom .
  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Ty-Photo ( 2 reviews ) and Value, Sharpness, Range, Vibration Reduction, Contrast, Weight
    miss of Distance scale, Distortion at 18mm-22mm
    I sure am storm that I am the first person to review this amazing lens ! I am identical glad that I decided to drop the $ 250 on this lens. I was shooting with the Nikon 18-70mm lens, which was already great for a main lens – but I was cook for something that added some rate and low lighter serviceability. The lens is quite crisp throughout. Although not perfect – I consider it sharp as it is sold as part of the D90 kit. It may not be 100 % tack astute – but it ‘s identical impressive for a lens found under $ 300 ! The image is besides identical commodious and utilitarian for locomotion if you decide not to drop the circa $ 600 on the the 18-200mm, which does n’t constantly deliver american samoa much distinctness as we wish for ! The vibration decrease works fabulously – particularly since the maximal aperture is just average. fortunately – the visualize choice is ideal at utmost aperture, so no stopping down is required. Anyway – I ‘m rambling – so merely go ahead and give this lens a try if you ‘re thinking about it !
  • 10 out of 10 points
    and recommended by jimj1952 ( 1 reviews ) and VR ! ! !, solid build-quality, great all-in-one lens
    none found then far
    I had been wanting a VR lens for quite some meter to replace the 18-135mm Nikon on my D50, but the only one that met my necessitate focal length scope was the 18-200mm, a great lens but way more than I could spend ! then a couple of weeks ago I saw this lens for $ 267.00 on-line, read a few reviews, then decided to jump on it … and am glad I did ! Have used it much over two weeks and am super pleased : build-quality and plan very like to the 18-135mm it replaced, but the VR is improbable ! ! I ‘ve taken several shots at 105mm ( 157mm equivalent ) at speeds a gloomy as 1/5 sec and the results were perplex. While I ‘m not saying those shots were american samoa sharp as higher shutter focal ratio results, I can say my wife did n’t notice anything when she viewed them. If you want one lens that ca n’t take probably 90 % of your shots, this is a thoroughly as it gets … for the price .
  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by andyafk ( 3 reviews ) and AP-S and VR 86.5viewing fish on 18mm
    “ a snatch heavy ” said from my sister
    comes with the d90 for 1109.00 ship north taxed
    105mm vignetting
  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Rene GM ( 6 reviews ) and shrill, dependable range, light, VR
    distortion
    I am using this lens nowadays for a while, and find it the optimum carryalong lens for me. It is very sharp with beneficial line and very full Bokeh. The build quality is good enough for me, since I do not change lenses identical much. even if I did, it would probably last for a farseeing clock.

    I like the VR, since it allows me to go for 1/15 securities and exchange commission about through the arrant scope. That is more than I expected. I besides like the manual focus override. I like the rapid climb ring. It does not creep and works well.

    You will get distortion at both ends, which you want to remove in postprocessing. If you do not want that, do not buy this specific lens. You credibly want a prime then, since about all zooms have a bunch of distortion over a wide range.

    Chromatic aberation was never a real trouble with this lens, though it has CA. Vignetting, I never observed. You will get vignetting merely full open at 18mm .

  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by rockmeister ( 1 reviews ) and price, sharpness at medium apertures, good vr, weight, ilter size
    little softening at 105 wide open, build not arsenic good as some Nikons
    A big equal for the D90 optically, and a decent all in one travel lens … longer zooms compromise ocular choice, so I ‘m glad with the 105. previous lenses included the excellent 18-70 … this seems equitable adenine good an ocular bargain + VR + an extra 35mm of zoom ; well done Nikon. I ‘ve added the 70 -300 Nikon, a Sigma 10-20 wide soar and hope for a tamron or Sigma macro for Christmas !
  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by hierophant ( 1 reviews ) and Sharpness, VR, cost
    flimsy corner-softness
    Upgraded to this lens after the autofocus motor on my 18-55 II failed. Proved to be an excellent decision as the lens is a considerable improvement over the old D40 kit lens.
    ocular quality is leading ; delivering sharply, contrasty images. Sharpness is consistent throughout its range, and excellent even when wide open.
    Construction quality is beneficial, despite the fictile climb ; VR and autofocus operations are about dumb.
    VR performs admirably, helping the lens give birth great low-light operation.
    There is some minor corner-softness and distortion, but not very noticeable unless you go looking for it.

    All in all, this lens is a desirable addition to Nikon ‘s batting order, and the best bang for the buck you can presently get .

  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by rewer ( 2 reviews ) and Sharpness, pungency, sharpness !
    18 millimeter
    I have Nikon D60 and replaced my 18-55/3,5-5,6 VR kit.Very shrill and now i can use CPL filters for batch landscape pictures.Fast concentrate, nice touch and more PRO look on your camera such kit out lens.This is my second lens i always used then i ‘m very happy with my fiddling upgrade.For beginners is perfect combination- commodity soundbox ( D60 ) +cheap lens ( around 250-300 USD ) .Go out and shoot !
  • 7 out of 10 points
    and recommended by gmenut ( 1 reviews ) and Compact for travel, VR
    Vignetting at 105 millimeter Distortion at 18 mmm
    I waited everlastingly to choose a lens other than the kit to buy a D80, thinking I did not want a boring, variable aperture lens, then gave up and preordered the D90 with the kit lens.
    I am pleasantly surprised with the kit lens + VR jazz band.
    After using Canon PowerShot and comparing with my film SLR experience ( Olympus OM ‘s + largely prime lenses ) I have entirely 2 minor complaints about the 18-105 : noticeable vignetting wide open at 105 millimeter and noticeable distorted shape at 18 millimeter. I know software can correct both but this is silent an supernumerary footfall. I know tests show CA broad exposed but the D90 processes this out in software. Overall this is a hardheaded roll for travel, I am planning to add a 70-300 VR and a longish fast Macro to round up the range. The fast tele lenses I actually drool over are $ 4,000 – 8,000. You ca n’t constantly get what you want…
    Recommended, but I would not go buy this lens to add to a stove if it did not come as a kit
  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by Gio ( 1 reviews ) and monetary value, sharpness, contrast, and VR
    none, given it`s intended consumer class market
    What other lens in this price class offers thus much for the money ?
    I`ve had all the early Nikon AFS18-XX ( X ) lenses and all were good fine but IMO this matchless is the good focal length for all around amateurish street shooting specially since it has shaking decrease.
    The build timbre is comparable to the 18-135 and better than all the 18-55`s and acuteness is ampere good as it gets in this section.
    OK, so there`s some distortion wide open but PT Lens ( $ 15 ) fixes most of it if it bothers you.
    If you need something faster you should consider spending 4-5 times more for the future footprint up .
  • 10 out of 10 points
    and recommended by paulyb ( 4 reviews ) and focal distance, double constancy, acuteness, slowly to use for novices
    naturally heavier than the 18-55mm kit lens I replaced, otherwise nothing truly
    After seeing batch of reviews all over the web, I got the mental picture many Nikon fans felt there ‘s no plaza for this lens in the lens batting order, but I disagree. It ‘s the arrant ascent from the 18-55 II kit lens ( which broke from being dropped, hence the successor upgrade ). One thing many Pro reviewers agree on is that VR seems to be a necessity now, quite than a luxury, thus based on that, the 18-135mm seems to be pleonastic ( but however a lens I seriously considered before this came out ).

    If you play with the 18-135, the difference between trope enlargement between 105 and 135mm is minimal. then the difference between 135mm to 200 millimeter is noticeable, but an extra $ 380 ! !

    Well, if this lens is in your budget, and you merely want to take big pictures of your syndicate, I thoroughly endorse this lens.

    The distortion at 18mm is noticeable when doing finale ups, but alone people looking for this will comment, such as lens reviewers and appliance geeks. All you in truth notice is the quality of the firm shot from the VR, and of course doubly the focal duration of the 18-55mm for details shots of buildings and landscapes.

    In the UK, this lens is being extracted from the kit and sold individually as some sellers are then offering the D90 body alone to owners who already have the 18-200mm ( or alike ), and do n’t pace the 18-105 as a desirable addition to their collection. I think there ‘s a magic trick here that you and I can exploit to buy a very low-cost VR lens with a very useable focal range, while the rest of the market scrambles of much more expensive ( and true superior ) alternatives.

    After reading the reviews on SLRgear.com, I made up my mind to buy and I ‘m very felicitous I did indeed. Thanks for all you who reviewed the lens hera and to SLRGear.com .

  • 9 out of 10 points
    and recommended by brecht ( 1 reviews ) and identical abrupt !

    I ‘ve been very felicitous with this in combination with a D90 .

  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by andillion ( 1 reviews ) and sharp ! ! !
    Plastic mount
    It is presently the best kit out lens.
    It is quiet, fast and light.

    And I think 18-105vr + 70-300vr should be a good combination

    Vignetting at 18mm F3.5 may not be a serious problem when using with D90. Because D90 has built-in vignetting control which is similar to D700

    And so far, I do n’t have any unplayful vignetting trouble when using this kit lens with D90

  • 8 out of 10 points
    and recommended by WCranston ( 4 reviews ) and

    VR, Good focal crop, cheap
    Plastic ride, distortion, some corner balminess
    This is a decent little lens. It is nice to have the VR, and I do n’t in truth like the 18-200 so I thought I would give this a test. No lens crawl like the 18-200 and seems like OOF areas render a little better than the 18-200. overall distinctness is very good, but decidedly in the worst cases at 18mm & f3.5 heavy vignetting and a morsel more distortion in some cases though not awful.

    In some cases I do think that the 18-70 is inactive a better all-around lens, but when you need the VR this + 70-300VR does reasonably well as lightweight locomotion kit .

Leave a Comment